Low sales and awkward uploading system.  For me, the trouble involved in uploading doesn't merit the effort. The sales potential being a bit below Bigstock (as shown in the chart on the right) matches my experience there.

The alamy problem has been fixed.  They used to have a rep that replied to questions here but he went.  I don't care about review times, never understood why people get so annoyed about that, as long as it's the same for everyone.  If anything, I prefer long review times because it puts some people off uploading and there's less competition.

Sales aren't great but they do sell more EL's than most sites and that gives them a nice boost every now and then.  Overall, I think they're a must for anyone with lots of sales on the bigger sites.  There's good reasons not to upload to all the sites but I find that isn't the most profitable policy   I'm removing most of my images from istock because they have gone too far, hopefully the other sites understand that they make more by respecting the contributor/agent relationship.

Unfortunately I spend too much time reading posts here

Same here!!  But I super appreciate your taking the time to reply!

Sales come slowly at Veer, but they delivered a $3.77 RPD for me in 2012. I actually made 60% more at Veer than I did at BigStock, even with fewer sales.

Similar for me - I made 33% more at Veer with only 800+ images than I did at BigStock with twice that many.

The big problems with Veer are that they pay the standard Veer payout on partner sales - regardless of what the partner site actually charged customers - and that there is no opt out of partner sales or their lack-lustre subscriptions.

Secondarily their review system is slow and bizarre - rejecting landscapes for lack of production value or too editorial for Veer customers for example. I know which images sell from the other sites and also that their site hasn't covered the subject, but they still reject.

They've also stopped any form of communication with contributors, so I've stopped uploading - I stopped when the Alamy mess happened and never restarted.

Periodically the contributor side of the site just stops working and it is weeks before they do anything. It just doesn't feel to me as if they're serious about the business, even though I keep hoping they may do something to perk things up. With Corbis as their parent though, I don't think there's any reason for optimism.

Sales come slowly at Veer, but they delivered a $3.77 RPD for me in 2012. I actually made 60% more at Veer than I did at BigStock, even with fewer sales.

I have the opposite situation, at BS earn 5x more than Veer. I guess everyone's experiences are different.

Everyone's experiences differ, I have only good experiences with Veer. (apart from the issues mentioned above; reviews sometimes are slow, there's the PP you can't opt-out from and sub commissions often are $0,25).
They sell a lot better than BS for me, support mails are always answered swiftly, reviews are fair, two times they used one of my pics for a promotional action (included in a free bundle for new clients) and payed me a flat fee of $100 for it, after asking nicely first. Quite a contrast with whats happening somewhere else at the moment

This past year I made about twice as much from BigStock as from Veer, although both are low earners for me (3.9% and 2%, respectively).  The difference between my experience and others who do better with Veer is that I submit a lot of images; due to Veer's upload limits my port there is one third of what I have on BigStock, and about a quarter of my Shuttterstock collection.  If you submit a small number of good sellers, Veer may be a good route for your sales.