Author Topic: Collections or spam?. Total absence of common sense and few neurons. (Read 3713 times)

Tenebroso · « **on:** December 31, 2019, 09:42 »

OFFICIAL COMMUNIQUE OF MY PART
TO CONTRIBUTING COMPANIONS.

This issue is not a problem of ours, of the contributors, as it does not have exclusivity. It is an agency problem. It's something temporary. There is less time left on this subject, I suppose. You cannot defend the indefensible, no matter how much courage you have.

OFFICIAL COMMUNICATE FROM MY PART TO CUSTOMERS
If you are a client and you are interested in my images, you know, because when it comes to money, customers react immediately, you do not need to edit the images, you pay and the full collection is found in the other agencies. Greetings.

Happy New Year to everyone.
Tenebroso

Hannafate · « **Reply #1 on:** January 01, 2020, 09:30 »

Please be less oblique.

What specifically are you complaining about?

If this even is a complaint...

Tenebroso · « **Reply #2 on:** January 01, 2020, 12:20 »

+1

Greetings, when we speak, we change the order of the words in the phrases in your language and in mine. This is equivalent to the way of expressing oneself, thinking and communicating.

Well, I understand that you ask me for an explanation about my post. No problem, I try to explain.

The first part is dedicated to contributors of footage.

In the title, it is specified that these are similar File examiners. Not differentiating spam from collections. for example, mp3 and mp4, can be collection files, but not similar. One is about audio files and another about video files. The lack of neurons and not respecting the company that pays them, as well as not respecting the work of the contributors, makes them deserve my press release or open letter to fellow contributors.

I do not speak of two mp3 files. Neither 4 nor 120. I speak of an mp3 file and reject the mp4 file. Not respecting my work, not respecting customers, not respecting their company or the work they do. Without excuses, they are directly assaulting me.

Encouraging them, since this situation, no matter how smart, big and special the SS brains are created, is simply an international ridiculous that in certain areas of the planet are not suitable for life and that we are not used to. Therefore, strength, since it is something temporary. Either the clients, the media, forums such as this one, and the professionals voluntarily back off, we have no choice but to wait until they stop making a fool of themselves, the SS agent. Simple, strength, since it is something temporary.

The second part is, if someone is interested in a file of mine, for example, wants an mp4 file, they should simply look at other agencies, where they do not understand the collections, for example, G3, G4, G5, G6 as spam, but, understand it as a real offer for potential customers.

Since SS, it has not accepted more than a TOP 30, when I have files on my PC with the TOP collection of around 200. Not only in number, but in necessary products. TOP video and TOP audio, and TOP music. If someone wants something from my files and is not in SS, maybe, until SS does not bend the ears and as long as I continue doing the international ridicule, in SS they are not all my images, not of spam, but of collection.

If you have any questions, do not hesitate to consult. I will try to clarify any doubt.

Regards
Tenebroso, The oblique

Mimi the Cat · « **Reply #3 on:** January 01, 2020, 14:53 »

Sorry if only I knew what you are trying to say it might make some sense

Your google translator is not doing a very good job.

Tenebroso · « **Reply #4 on:** January 01, 2020, 15:09 »

Oh really, don't feel it. It's not important.

Tenebroso · « **Reply #5 on:** January 02, 2020, 04:26 »

It seems that examiners with some common sense and respect for their work have already returned to their work. Someone already knows how to differentiate Spam File Collections. It seems that they left very novices and without common sense, at the head of the archival exams during the holiday period. Or maybe, they have tired of making a fool of themselves.

SpaceStockFootage · « **Reply #6 on:** January 02, 2020, 04:33 »

Shutterstock are rejecting some of your submissions?

Tenebroso · « **Reply #7 on:** January 02, 2020, 05:01 »

Yes, if what you want is to see what illustrations they have rejected, go through my channel, in the rest of the day I will upload again, and I hope they accept my collections. An illustration of TOP 30 and TOP 3 cannot be rejected as similar, since it is not similar. Some client needs to make lists of Three TOP's, and 50 Top's. I will not upload images here.

My approach is that you have to differentiate collections of files from similar files. And it seems that today's examiner understands. I hope the rest of the day stays that way. Since uploading files during the Christmas period has meant wasting my time.

With examiners dealing with similar, file collections. For example, they reject an mp4 file, if they approve an mp3 file. Or for example, two images with WIFI symbol, even if it is Wi-Fi 6 or WIFI zone, which has nothing in common, but I will not invent a symbol for WIFI, however few neurons an SS examiner has, the symbol of Wi-Fi is the international recognized by all, and I will not put Wi-Fi zone with a signal from NASA.

But seeing the WIFI symbol, they put it as similar. Conclusion. They eat spam and reject valid files. This is something temporary, and sooner or later, no matter how bigheads and stars they think they are, it has the days counted to recognize the difference between spam collections. Simple, common sense and responsibility for their work.

They will be able to continue with the nonsense of huge files for vectors, but the similar one, they will have to eat it as a ridicule of cosmic magnitude, since customers to see collections go to other agencies, since they know that not all files They are in SS.