Author Topic: Am I the only one who sees this and why? (Read 2382 times)

erik trikowich · « **on:** August 03, 2024, 08:40 »

About a month later I started seeing this. At first I thought it was a temporary glitch. Now I don't know what to think. Is anyone else seeing this kind of mess?

PeteStock · « **Reply #1 on:** August 03, 2024, 10:59 »

Yes, same.
I think a bug when they added the contributor fund in the earnings there (it has a seperate line now)

zeljkok · « **Reply #2 on:** August 03, 2024, 17:34 »

Same here, and it's been for awhile. This is what happens when you frequently change interface - bugs creep in.

erik trikowich · « **Reply #3 on:** August 07, 2024, 12:20 »

Few people have checked in - should I understand that the rest are not interested in this topic? The information is not displayed - well, screw them

Should we take any measures, or wait until it resolves itself?

Uncle Pete · « **Reply #4 on:** August 12, 2024, 11:15 »

Quote from: erik trikowich on August 07, 2024, 12:20

Few people have checked in - should I understand that the rest are not interested in this topic? The information is not displayed - well, screw them
Should we take any measures, or wait until it resolves itself?

Interested or not, this is the usual. What should I say or do? Yes, I see the same as you do.

But just as a supporting point, the same genius who broke the site, probably programmed the graph as well. Hey, nice choice of colors that are almost all the same, so it's difficult to see which is which?

What I do care about is, worst month ever since I started and one sale at AS is more than a whole month at SS?

cascoly · « **Reply #5 on:** August 12, 2024, 13:10 »

Quote from: zeljkok on August 03, 2024, 17:34

Same here, and it's been for awhile. This is what happens when you frequently change interface - bugs creep in.

what's worse is when they make a change and don't do regression testing or beta testing before releasing it into the wild . Wirestock was one of the worst offenders here - seemed like every new feature created 2+ new bugs, which they mostly refused to admit existed. i stopped submitting to them more than a year ago, so things may have changed

Uncle Pete · « **Reply #6 on:** August 14, 2024, 14:14 »

Quote from: cascoly on August 12, 2024, 13:10

Quote from: zeljkok on August 03, 2024, 17:34
Same here, and it's been for awhile. This is what happens when you frequently change interface - bugs creep in.

what's worse is when they make a change and don't do regression testing or beta testing before releasing it into the wild . Wirestock was one of the worst offenders here - seemed like every new feature created 2+ new bugs, which they mostly refused to admit existed. i stopped submitting to them more than a year ago, so things may have changed

I don't know about WS, because I won't pay up front for bland descriptive, non-specific keywords. But, SS with the latest system changes has ruined the site once again. Try looking at the new catalog manager, which sometimes doesn't load, and when it does, sometimes has no images, and if you click use legacy, it takes you to a half assed broken page, with blank space beneath it.

https://submit.shutterstock.com/catalog_manager

All it would take would have been a couple of people testing, before they activated the new site?

The image sets come and go. Which reminds me, I should make a catalog of those, in case I ever want to use one of them again.

erik trikowich · « **Reply #7 on:** August 15, 2024, 06:58 »

Good times have come. Adobestock checks works for half a year, and Shutterstock can't (or won't) fix its own problems. And some here claim that classical photography is not dying!