pancakes

MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Poll

On Shutterstock, how many images do you need to earn $10,000 month

5,000
23 (6.7%)
7,500
9 (2.6%)
10,000
13 (3.8%)
12,500
5 (1.5%)
15,000
10 (2.9%)
17.500
11 (3.2%)
20,000
37 (10.8%)
22,500
2 (0.6%)
25,000
13 (3.8%)
27,500
0 (0%)
30,000
36 (10.5%)
32,500
5 (1.5%)
35,000
6 (1.7%)
37,500
4 (1.2%)
40,000
170 (49.4%)

Total Members Voted: 318

Author Topic: How many images do you need to achieve $10,000/month  (Read 61168 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Photominer

« Reply #100 on: October 06, 2014, 15:13 »
+1

Scott, that makes a lot of sense and it's great that you do such deals and we can benefit from that. But as others have said, those sales are very few compared to regular subs (I yet have to see one of those big SODs).
As a motivation to create and upload niche content or to spend a lot of time and money to research, set up, shoot and keyword with the needed accuracy, those sales do not really work.
Because those niche shots or expensively created shots may end up being downloaded a handful of times (because they're niche content there is no high volume demand) for subs royalties.

But if there were an option to make such content available only to those higher paying buyers... (or to all buyers for a respective add-on price), that would be a lot more motivating...

+1, Nicely put.


CCK

« Reply #101 on: October 21, 2014, 02:16 »
+6
This poll doesn't work for me, I will need way more than 40,000 photos!

« Reply #102 on: July 14, 2015, 16:51 »
0
So, is there something concretely here?
Is there someone in this post who earns $ 10,000 a month? Or $5000 and home many images he/she has online?

Lets roll this post....  8)

« Reply #103 on: July 14, 2015, 17:36 »
+6
Its a stupid question because the amount you make each month is more to do with how commercial your images are than the number you produce.

« Reply #104 on: July 14, 2015, 22:38 »
+2
Its a stupid question because the amount you make each month is more to do with how commercial your images are than the number you produce.
I assumed that we were answering based on our own portfolios.

« Reply #105 on: July 14, 2015, 22:39 »
+5
Its a stupid question because the amount you make each month is more to do with how commercial your images are than the number you produce.

Not to mention that a port which might have earned 10k/month 2 or 3 years ago (ahem) might not be earning anywhere near that now thanks to the countless reasons always being discussed here. 

« Reply #106 on: July 14, 2015, 22:47 »
+4
Its a stupid question because the amount you make each month is more to do with how commercial your images are than the number you produce.

Not to mention that a port which might have earned 10k/month 2 or 3 years ago (ahem) might not be earning anywhere near that now thanks to the countless reasons always being discussed here.
That's true. My answer would have been 7500 a few years back and it is now 30000.

« Reply #107 on: July 15, 2015, 00:33 »
+15
It is a flawed poll. Realistically, very few of the 40,000 images portfolios would achieve the $10,000 income. Of course, there are exceptions, and then there is the hard reality.
 
Another thing is that even if you make $1,000 with x images presently in your portfolio, you can't increase the income linearly with a tenfold increase of the portfolio. If you have currently a profitable niche with 100 pictures, by increasing it tenfold, you'll be diluting the profitability of the old and new images in this niche, and consequently any increase in total income would be marginal. So the answer would seem to be to to come up with new undiscovered niches, which is much easier said than done.
   

« Reply #108 on: July 15, 2015, 19:49 »
+1
It is a flawed poll. Realistically, very few of the 40,000 images portfolios would achieve the $10,000 income. Of course, there are exceptions, and then there is the hard reality.
 
Another thing is that even if you make $1,000 with x images presently in your portfolio, you can't increase the income linearly with a tenfold increase of the portfolio. If you have currently a profitable niche with 100 pictures, by increasing it tenfold, you'll be diluting the profitability of the old and new images in this niche, and consequently any increase in total income would be marginal. So the answer would seem to be to to come up with new undiscovered niches, which is much easier said than done.
   

agree +100 Les
i look back at my past 5 years and with the increase of portfolio of almost 50 % from the first 5 years, my income is still the same monthly from the older images that are regularly downloaded.
the new images from year 3,4 and 5 earned almost pennies.
not sure if this is due to the change in search . but if so, why are the oldest images still the regular sellers?

« Reply #109 on: June 28, 2017, 13:42 »
0
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2017, 11:07 by Spinfield »

jonbull

    This user is banned.
« Reply #110 on: June 28, 2017, 13:59 »
+1
the biggest problem nowadays is that uploading new content bring marginal improvement to the pot...had i uploaded the file that i uploaded in the last two years in 2010 i would have made much more than what i'm doing in the last year....in 2017 i uploaded 1500 travel fav food and lifestyle images and they are giving me 120 dollar each month seems january....the bulk of my sales is still those file that are in first page in search...mostly stuff i uploaded years ago...many buyer simply don't wanna bother with searching new files they go direct to popular or relevant...new isa  mess with all those b..it uploaded this days.
so if you earn for example 1000 dollar with 3000 or 5000 file you cannot do a direct relation....but at least for every 1000 more you need double number..so for gain another 1000 you need 7500 or more images. is more exponential growth than linear...

sure you can nail even one single niche file who make you 1000 in a year, but this is very rare todays.
that guys who not upload 6 years in a row and still earn 1000 dollar is the proof of this, had he uploaded those files in 2017 iu doubt he would have earned 1000 dollar from 3200 files of normal lifestyle.
sometimes i hope the agency abolish popular and most downloaded search option. this would be another story for many.

Shelma1

  • stockcoalition.org
« Reply #111 on: June 28, 2017, 14:17 »
+28
Old thread alert.

« Reply #112 on: June 28, 2017, 17:48 »
+2
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2017, 11:08 by Spinfield »

« Reply #113 on: June 28, 2017, 18:35 »
+5
Old thread alert.

Very cute... You got 3 "+" from your fans.

Now it's four.

dpimborough

« Reply #114 on: June 29, 2017, 02:18 »
+2
Old thread alert.

Very cute... You got 3 "+" from your fans.

Now it's four.

Now it's fourteen :D

Justanotherphotographer

« Reply #115 on: June 29, 2017, 03:44 »
+13
Old thread alert.

Very cute... You got 3 "+" from your fans.
Your first ever post was to call someone a "mother f**ker" and a "dumbass", your fourth to revive a 3 year old thread and your sixth to patronise/ insult one of the main contributors to the forum.

We could be in line for the greatest first ten forum posts ever! Can't wait to see what numbers 7-10 bring!!

« Reply #116 on: June 29, 2017, 07:56 »
+4
Old thread alert.

Very cute... You got 3 "+" from your fans.
Your first ever post was to call someone a "mother f**ker" and a "dumbass", your fourth to revive a 3 year old thread and your sixth to patronise/ insult one of the main contributors to the forum.

We could be in line for the greatest first ten forum posts ever! Can't wait to see what numbers 7-10 bring!!



HAHAHA..excellent post


dpimborough

« Reply #117 on: June 29, 2017, 08:11 »
+3
Old thread alert.

Very cute... You got 3 "+" from your fans.

Shelma now has 17 from her fans ~ ;D

Shelma1

  • stockcoalition.org
« Reply #118 on: June 29, 2017, 09:25 »
+5
Hey, this turned out to be a pretty funny thread. Lol.

Polarpx

  • Photographer

« Reply #119 on: June 29, 2017, 11:02 »
+1
Over 50.000 quality images/vectors


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

« Reply #120 on: June 29, 2017, 12:14 »
0
yes, old thread, perharps. but i think i like to see if those ppl who said 40,000 way back still think 40,000 in today's sh*tterstock environment they would make 10,000 / month. that is, if they are all still without sh*tterstock

« Reply #121 on: June 29, 2017, 12:38 »
+2
I gave Shelma a + since she's from my home state.

« Reply #122 on: June 29, 2017, 15:45 »
0
Shelma, are you Michele Paccione?

Bad Company

« Reply #123 on: June 29, 2017, 20:30 »
+1
Shelma, are you Michele Paccione?

Hannafate,  Are you Darla Hallmark from Albuquerque?

« Reply #124 on: June 30, 2017, 08:35 »
+1
Yes.  But, if Selma is NOT Michele, there is a problem.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
38 Replies
17057 Views
Last post February 06, 2009, 23:50
by lephotography
17 Replies
7868 Views
Last post May 14, 2010, 10:37
by fotografer
2 Replies
4724 Views
Last post September 15, 2013, 12:07
by leaf
9 Replies
5982 Views
Last post May 23, 2021, 23:42
by cristianstorto
0 Replies
1097 Views
Last post February 17, 2024, 19:29
by The Mighty Jungle

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors