MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: How an image is promoted in the Popular Cateogry on Shutter  (Read 2745 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Goofy

« on: February 04, 2014, 10:38 »
0
Does anyone have theories on how an image is elevated on the popular category for Shutter?  I've thought maybe views, subs downloads, OD's, SOD and EL. Also the dollar amount of the SOD's? Since Shutter give promotions to artists based on $$ I was thinking just the $$ amount of the sales on the image might be the sole trigger to determining where it resides on the popular page?


« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2014, 10:54 »
+2
No, and it changes from time to time, plus also possibly by geography and it might be different depending on who is doing the searching. In any case the time a file has been at SS also is an important part of the mix. It used to be some variation of sales/time but if that is all it is now they have tweaked it so that recent files with a few sales are above older files with a lot more sales.

grey1

    This user is banned.
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2014, 10:55 »
-5
Does anyone have theories on how an image is elevated on the popular category for Shutter?  I've thought maybe views, subs downloads, OD's, SOD and EL. Also the dollar amount of the SOD's? Since Shutter give promotions to artists based on $$ I was thinking just the $$ amount of the sales on the image might be the sole trigger to determining where it resides on the popular page?

visit the thread above!  some of the brainiest people on the planet are voicing their opinions.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2014, 11:57 by grey1 »

« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2014, 08:28 »
-1
The problem is the choice of the words.
Most buyers would assume that "most popular" order would list the images sorted by the number of downloads.
If they make a purchase decision based on the false information, that could be a valid reason to sue the supplier for being deceptive and unethical.


 
« Last Edit: February 05, 2014, 08:35 by LesPalenik »

ShadySue

  • There is a crack in everything
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2014, 08:33 »
0
The problem is the choice of the words.
Most buyers would assume that "most popular" order would list the images sorted by the number of downloads.
If they make a purchase decision based on the false information, that could be a valid reason to sue the supplier for being deceptive and unethical.
I'm not sure that I would expect 'most popular' to be the same as most downloads.
It could be that, or it could be most sold 'recently' however that's defined.
After all, could it be said that an image which hypothetically sold hundreds images way back, but has only sold ten images in the past couple of years (e.g. because of competition in the intervening period) is currently 'most popular'?
I suspect the word 'popular' is legally vague.

« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2014, 08:38 »
+1
In the current implementation of the "popular" sort order, you can get images that never sold, shown before images that were sold multiple times.
That is by any definition incorrect and deceptive information.
 


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
7 Replies
5196 Views
Last post September 21, 2007, 13:06
by Whiz
5 Replies
3975 Views
Last post January 07, 2012, 03:58
by RacePhoto
85 Replies
16841 Views
Last post January 30, 2013, 00:39
by CD123
0 Replies
2372 Views
Last post September 07, 2013, 14:33
by cascoly
1 Replies
2440 Views
Last post April 13, 2015, 11:55
by Mrblues101

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors