|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Recards
1
« on: June 30, 2022, 06:48 »
Please give me Matt's contact. I got blocked by fake DMCA complaints
2
« on: June 30, 2022, 03:31 »
My account was blocked for alleged plagiarism.
At one time, there were 3 complaints from different accounts with similar images. I contacted one author, whose contact I found on the Internet. He said he didn't file a DMCA claim about my file. My files are similar but are not copies, redraws or borrowings within the meaning of the plagiarism. I'm sure someone is overuse the simple complaint system.
My counter claims are ignored, I even ask to simply delete the disputed files, because I just want to keep working.
Has anyone experienced something similar?
3
« on: February 22, 2022, 17:24 »
4
« on: June 02, 2020, 16:15 »
I deactivated my portfolio of 10K
6
« on: November 19, 2017, 05:11 »
And also you can use AdBlock extantion to hide big Delete button 
8
« on: December 23, 2016, 01:48 »
I got this We regret to inform you that a refund of $69.00 has been issued for the purchase of your file #***********. This transaction has now been voided from your GI or Partner Program sales. The client has complied with all policies surrounding the refund and destruction of this file.
Regards,
The iStock Team
10
« on: December 22, 2016, 02:14 »
All my cvs files are incorrectly reflect data because numbers are shown as dates.
Or in wrong positions(moved) in cells.
11
« on: December 22, 2016, 02:08 »
12
« on: December 22, 2016, 02:05 »
SS no longer accept printed and scanned logos, any kind of logos in vector.
Whatever can be protected by copyright - vector coca-cola shape, vector polaroid and so on
13
« on: December 07, 2016, 12:46 »
Dear all!
Freelancers Union needs very much some stories about How new Getty policy affect us!
US-journalists are ready to help, but they need real emotional source from us.
More activity - more pr-value to come!
15
« on: November 12, 2016, 02:28 »
I ask SS to add new payout method before petition.
They answer that Payoneer will be added ASAP (this or beginning of next year)
16
« on: November 04, 2016, 23:35 »
Would anyone like to volunteer an image for the petition page? Something that captures the spirit...an artist painting? A photographer shooting? Someone grabbing money? I don't want to license something and then find out the person who shot it doesn't want the image associated with this cause.
And it can be OOF, have lighting issues or noise...rejected images are fine.
Let's check Highsmith collection 
18
« on: November 03, 2016, 09:44 »
We - designers, photographers, video and sound editors - invested our education, skills, experience to Getty.
We spend money for computers, cameras and other necessary hardware.
We pay lot of money for licensed design software such as Adobe CC, Illustrator plug-ins, Photoshop, AfterEffect etc.
Many are drawing every day and spend a lot for brushes, paints, paper also.
All this brings to Getty great income, but after all Getty values all our expences and labour only in #2cents and in some cases they dared even not to pay it.
It's completely despicable from Getty side.
Getty does not create any products to devalue my labour, my work so low.
19
« on: November 03, 2016, 07:32 »
Russian on me
20
« on: November 02, 2016, 09:28 »
Done,
thank you Shelma1!
21
« on: October 31, 2016, 12:40 »
I'm speaking with someone from Freelancer's Union this afternoon. Keep in mind that this isn't really what you think of as a "Union;" they don't organize people or represent groups legally. So I'm not sure where this will go or how or whether they can help in any way. However, dozens of people have emailed them, so we did get their attention.
Right now they're just confused and want clarification about what's going on.
I'm sorry I didnt see this message earlier.
22
« on: October 31, 2016, 08:09 »
We dont sell videos or images. We selling right to ride on them And our car is iMac
23
« on: October 31, 2016, 06:55 »
B) If we're considered employees, then surely we'd not own the copyright on our own work, as it would be 'work for hire'?
 In this case the car shoud belong to Uber (Toronto case)
24
« on: October 30, 2016, 13:35 »
It is a private enterprise and they can and will do what they want BUT the power is within us It is every contributor and their personal decision that changes the Stock map.
We already have a good case how to fight for our rights! Drivers for the cab-hailing firm Uber will learn later whether they are entitled to holiday pay, rest breaks and the National Living Wage.
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-37787067"This case represents the first proper legal review of whether jobs in this part of the so-called gig economy really represent a new paradigm of freedom and self-employment, or in fact are simply a new technology ploy to deny employed workers ordinary employment rights and a national minimum wage," says Maria Ludkin, legal director at the GMB.Right now, our Russian speaking part of contibutor society is working on petition, so wait for answer from Freelancers Unity. Our intention is to put this case to court in Germany, Britain or USA. Do not delete your accounts, but deactivate top sales. This way you can impact.
25
« on: October 28, 2016, 11:15 »
Though it wouldn't hurt if someone there picked up the story and it spread among freelance designers.
Completely agree! I have already contacted with manager and she agreed to start talking about it in two weeks by phone call. It is good news for us but my English is not good enough to tell and understand correctly. Would you help and talk to her about Getty, and give us feedback. Here are her contacts: Sharon (Member Engagement Manager), 718-532-1515 x669. [email protected]Freelancers Union. 408 Jay Street, 2nd Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201. FreelancersUnion . org
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
