MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Gunter Nezhoda
26
« on: March 17, 2013, 15:50 »
27
« on: March 08, 2013, 13:03 »
Wien, lebe in Las Vegas
28
« on: March 06, 2013, 23:26 »
Hope this helps
29
« on: February 11, 2013, 16:54 »
Hi Gunter,[/size] [/color] [/size]Thank you for your message and sorry to see you go.Your account has now been closed as requested and final payment details have been sent to accounting to payout after 30 days to include any partner program royalties earned.Best of luck to you in your future endeavors.Sincerely, KayleneiStockphoto LPContributor RelationsToll-free 1-866-478-6251Ph: 403-265-3062[/color]
30
« on: February 07, 2013, 15:57 »
[/size][/size][/font][/size][/font][/color][/t][/size][/color][/t]An Important Update from Bigstock As you know, we already offer Bigstock customers the flexibility of pre-paying with credits. Next week, well be offering our customers an increasingly popular way to buy images: subscriptions. How will this affect me? Subscriptions can generate higher download volumes, which can increase your total earnings from Bigstock. Heres how you will earn royalties from Bigstock subscriptions:[/color][/font][/size][/font][/color]- Every time one of your images is downloaded using a subscription, you will earn a royalty.
- The more downloads youve acquired in the previous 12 months, the higher your royalty will be, up to $0.38USD per download.
Here are the details:
Number of Downloads in Previous 12 Months[/b][/color][/size][/font][/font][/color] [/size][/color]Royalty per Download[/size][/b] | [/t] | [/size][/color]From[/size][/b] | [/size][/color]To[/size][/b] | [/size][/color]In USD[/size][/b] | [/size][/color]1[/size] | [/size][/color]199[/size] | [/size][/color]$0.25[/size] | [/size][/color]200[/size] | [/size][/color]999[/size] | [/size][/color]$0.27[/size] | [/size][/color]1,000[/size] | [/size][/color]1,999[/size] | [/size][/color]$0.29[/size] | [/size][/color]2,000[/size] | [/size][/color]9,999[/size] | [/size][/color]$0.31[/size] | [/size][/color]10,000[/size] | [/size][/color]19,999[/size] | [/size][/color]$0.33[/size] | [/size][/color]20,000[/size] | [/size][/color]49,999[/size] | [/size][/color]$0.35[/size] | [/size][/color]50,000+[/size] | [/size][/color] [/size] | [/size][/color]$0.38[/size] | |
- Any Bigstock download will be counted to determine which royalty tier is applied, regardless of how our customers license the image.
- Credit and partner royalties will remain unchanged.
- Extended licenses cannot be purchased using a subscription, and will continue to generate a royalty of up to $29.70.
Are there any other updates? Yes. We have put in place a 250,000 print run limitation on our Standard License. We believe this will increase demand for Extended Licenses, generating higher royalties for you from Bigstock. We are also simplifying our Standard Image License terms to bring Bigstock more closely in line with industry standards for royalty-free licenses. What if I have questions? If you have any questions, just reply to this email. We're here to help. Cheers, Ben Pfeifer, GM, Bigstock |
|
[/td][/tr][/table]
31
« on: January 25, 2013, 17:21 »
32
« on: January 22, 2013, 18:10 »
Now, anybody who does not understand why the agencies treat contributors as they do, read this thread. May be we all should shape up and become a little bit more professional.
Strike (removing images) never works, and if more established contributors try to tell newbies not to apply .......... I don't even want to finish this sentence.
Be so good that nobody can ignore you, make yourself needed, then they will come and pay you.
Somebody mentioned Walmart. Walmart became so big because they pay next to nothing for merchandise. Their buying power is so strong that they don't have too. Same happens in Micro right now. The only exception to get into Walmart is having an item they need and you are one who can deliver for less. As a manufacturer, if you want your product displayed, they charge rent for shelf space, don't wanna go further into that, but micro stock has the same future. Only top notch photographers will be on display and for newbies and weak "Merchants" will be no room. Enjoy the time as long as you can make money in this industry and raise the bar. Once everything is dialed in, max 2 more years (In my opinion) they will not accept new applications and you will have to have big connections to become part of it. So, newbies, sign up NOW. Established contributors (many made a killing, especially the ones who do it since 2005) do not want new competition, which is ok and understandable, but for my part, I will not listen and will try to get a piece of the pie. That's what free market is all about. May the best win.
33
« on: January 15, 2013, 18:28 »
I'll be in my corner, making photos
34
« on: January 15, 2013, 18:24 »
got it on the 14th
35
« on: January 08, 2013, 01:32 »
One thing I don't understand is that the agencies and everybody else always calls our payout a commission. Maybe I'm wrong, but my understanding is that we pay commission to the agency. They are, well, an agent, we have the merchandise/product, they sell it for us and receive a commission. Which means, that to some of the agents or on some of the transactions the seller (Photographer) pays 80% commission. I don't know any other industry where those numbers would be valid. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission
36
« on: January 01, 2013, 16:49 »
1280x800
37
« on: November 20, 2012, 13:35 »
Keeping up with the competition - does that mean I don't have to wait 3 month for my payout anymore?
38
« on: October 12, 2012, 02:33 »
I was watching one of the documentaries in the Megacities series with Andrew Marr a while back.
There's a giant open sewer, I think it was in Mexico City, basically like a giant river of sh*t and toxic waste 30 odd feet wide. Every now and then the vents at the end of this river of sh*t get blocked. Often with the decaying body of say, a dog, or a victim of crime who has been dumped in the huge river of excrement. These vents are 50 feet down in the pitch black under a massive weight of sewerage. It is the job of this one guy to put on a diving suit, and go down 50 feet in the pitch black sh*t river and fish out unspeakable stuff from these holes and hope that a syringe doesn't puncture his suit causing him to die from some hideous disease.
This is an essential job, without this guy the waste system in the city would stop working. How long do you think we'd have to hold out to find someone who's passion it is to fish month old corpses from under a river of sh*t without material compensation?
But if nobody does it, the ones who do what they love (Engineers), never would design the system like that, and cities would put something different in place (like a machine that cleans it) as a solution, which needs to be engineered. Therefore the engineers can keep doing what they love and the crap-diver can move on to better things
39
« on: October 03, 2012, 22:05 »
I heard they sold an image a couple of days ago, that might have crashed the server
40
« on: September 27, 2012, 16:09 »
oh, this was awesome, thanks for posting this, all the best to you
41
« on: September 05, 2012, 19:53 »
It won't let me edit, I just post it again, I think that's it: I think it's: Alamy get's 40%, Yay get's 60%, that's $60 to Yay Photographer get's 50% from Yay's commission. That's $30 to you, which is 50% less than if you are direct. You basically split your commission with Yay.
42
« on: September 05, 2012, 19:49 »
So if you sell an image through them at Alamy for 100$, does Alamy get 40, and you and Yay each get 30 or does Alamy get 40 and Yay 10 and you 50?
Much better than how Veer went about it anyway.
I think it's more like Alamy get's 40%, Yay get's 60%, that's $60 to Yay Photographer get's 50% from Yay's commission. That's $30 to you, which is 10% less than if you are direct.
By your arithmetic, it would be 50% less than if you were direct, when you would get $60. I don't know if that's how they're working it out, as the announcement was ambiguous, but it certainly would be one interpretation. That was the 40/30/30 scenario indicated by PancakeTom.
You are correct, I edited, should be right now
43
« on: September 05, 2012, 19:40 »
So if you sell an image through them at Alamy for 100$, does Alamy get 40, and you and Yay each get 30 or does Alamy get 40 and Yay 10 and you 50?
Much better than how Veer went about it anyway.
I think it's: Alamy get's 40%, Yay get's 60%, that's $60 to Yay Photographer get's 50% from Yay's commission. That's $30 to you, which is 30% less than if you are direct. You basically split your commission with Yay
44
« on: May 21, 2012, 18:07 »
Almost 2 years ago I tried to apply and they told me come back in 4 weeks, nothing happened and I emailed 6 months later and they replied that they don't accept new contributors. I don't say there was no reason, my images certainly were not top notch, but today, 2 years later most of them are and I'm kicking on the top agencies who accepted me in the beginning. Why support SF now? They didn't support me and we have plenty other $50 a year agencies. Whatsoever, I'm ready to upload ........ how much do you pay per approved image?
45
« on: April 03, 2012, 16:25 »
Just the one sale after I first uploaded there and nothing since
+1
46
« on: March 07, 2012, 20:14 »
This is the first time I've seen it, underneath an image is a button "Edit Beta" and you can edit the image online with a simple editor (like Picasa). Interesting ...................
47
« on: February 22, 2012, 17:44 »
Done Franky, schau mal auch bei meiner seite vorbei, gruesse aus Las Vegas
48
« on: February 21, 2012, 20:41 »
49
« on: February 09, 2012, 17:48 »
50
« on: February 09, 2012, 17:40 »
LAS VEGAS NEVADA - February 04: Gary DelCoure at the Go Kart race at the Las Vegas Speedway on February 04, 2012 in Las Vegas Nevada.
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|