|
MicrostockGroup Sponsors
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Reaktori
1
« on: June 18, 2013, 16:53 »
This mail was all i got.
I don't dare to contact them. I'll just order me another U2713 and some new lenses.
It has to be truck loads of $$$'s 
sorry but that doesn't make sense I really think you should contact them
sure you can go and accept whatever money SS is willing to pay you (amount you still don't know), IMO I believe that email is spam and nothing will happen, never heard anything like this from SS, selling our file as exclusive?
there is something fishy going on
p.s: have you got that file removed?
Was joking. Of course i contacted them. Waiting for reply. Thumbnail for the image is showing in catalog manager, but as soon as i click it i get a popup with message: We can't find the content you wanted to edit, please check the ID (xxxxxxxx) and try again. So this image seems to be deleted and the mail seems to be legit. Will have to wait and see.
2
« on: June 18, 2013, 16:25 »
This mail was all i got. I don't dare to contact them. I'll just order me another U2713H and some new lenses. It has to be truck loads of $$$'s
3
« on: June 18, 2013, 15:26 »
Got an email from Shutterstock with topic: Removed some images
The mail:
------------------------------------
xxxxx xxxxxx,
We have removed the following images that you uploaded.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) deleted because: Per
Exclusive Sale.
Regards,
ShutterStock Support
------------------------------------
(x's are me sensoring sensitive information)
Is this a good mail about $$$'s that don't yet show on my account or is this a bad mail?
What does it mean?
4
« on: March 15, 2013, 20:05 »
Wow! It's amazing how good vector illustrations a Nikon 70-200 can make!
5
« on: March 13, 2013, 01:13 »
Thanks for advertise for my golfstuff
6
« on: March 09, 2013, 19:37 »
With this image I think the 'Background Eraser Tool' on a duplicate would have been faster.
7
« on: March 08, 2013, 01:10 »
I have a $2 offset in 123rf earnings in picNiche.
8
« on: March 02, 2013, 15:48 »
Been watching all week. A tired week due to time difference had to buy 4 of most interesting and missed courses.
9
« on: February 28, 2013, 18:09 »
That policy sure feels crazy to me.
Example:
I have a friend that really doesn't want to appear in any sold image with his face showing.
I have a release for a image with him his face masked. I use my own release with a shoot description, but there is no field for shoot description in DS's own MR form.
So if I would be "idiot" I could sell all the fun/artsy photos we have shot with the guy since i have the one release from year -1. All released in DS.
The example might be far fetched, but why refuse several releases? What harm does it do to allow more than one release /person?
HDD space comes in to mind, but it's like "a fart in the desert" compared to the HDD space all the images use.
10
« on: February 27, 2013, 16:10 »
Oh Thank You!
Seems like I was too hasty (again).
I was assuming that i did have to attach the MR since my people photos were the only ones left on queue.
11
« on: February 27, 2013, 03:21 »
I just got accepted to GL and I'm a bit lost.
I had some people pictures in my initial patch and after being accepted I've uploaded the MR's.
How do I attach a MR to image?
When hovering over a picture in 'Pending' section there appears a overlay that states 'Edit' & 'MR'.
By clicking the 'Edit' I'm redirected to keywording/titling page, but when I click 'MR' it doesn't take me anywhere.
Tried with FF & ie. Help?
12
« on: February 22, 2013, 19:03 »
had an email from Stocksy just now they are launching soon 
Same here
13
« on: February 19, 2013, 13:21 »
I'm in Finland and I'm getting a repeated overlay box that has writing "Undefined" and a OK -button.
14
« on: February 19, 2013, 09:29 »
Thank God for second round. I got one single DL on the first run.
15
« on: February 18, 2013, 13:45 »
Sorry to dig this 'old' topic up but:
I've had problems with FTP upload processing. I upload with filezilla to several agencies. I then see files through to other places to give SS time to process...
And still almost every time when i come back to SS the files haven't appeared on the list. Then i upload the same files with http and more than often some of the same files suddenly appear twice on the list. Frustrating.
16
« on: February 16, 2013, 04:42 »
At the moment they are at least at 4th and PP sales for me seem to be even less than on December.
17
« on: February 15, 2013, 18:56 »
 not cool.
18
« on: February 15, 2013, 18:37 »
Hey everyone,
I ahve been using FileZilla to upload images but I am finding that it is not successfully connecting to a couple sites and I was wondering if anyone had other programs they are using instead of FileZilla? FileZilla seems to work most of the time, but not always.
Thanks!!!!
What sites are causing problems?
19
« on: February 13, 2013, 01:22 »
You could try to import the folder in smaller chunks of files to find the possibly broken file. Don't know if this is the issue here, but I've noticed that some people use just one album. One should make new album for every shoot / set of images. If only one album is used for all the images, the cache/database/meta is drowning even stronger computer in small steps.
20
« on: February 12, 2013, 06:23 »
Had 1 sale last week! That's 100% better than 2012.
So you had 0.5 sale in 2012??
100% better = doubled; 100% of 2012's sales = same as; from 0 to 1 is an infinite increase - anything times 0 is 0 . As a percentage the increase is undefined is I think the way you'd say that.
Ok! Infinite % better than 2012! ( http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=smarty%20pants )
21
« on: February 10, 2013, 19:04 »
Had 1 sale last week! That's 100% better than 2012.
22
« on: February 07, 2013, 10:17 »
Kauan jaksat pohdiskella Lmset nyt vaan paperit faksiin ja vedt EIN:ll. Ei oo ollu ongelmia mihinkn suuntaan ja toiminimi on yritysmuotona.
23
« on: February 05, 2013, 19:29 »
Ja tietty sitten, ku oot saanu asian selville, niin laadit siit esseen tnne Suomi-osioon
24
« on: February 05, 2013, 19:29 »
Mitenks yritysoppineet nette tmn: http://www.microstockgroup.com/general-stock-discussion/selling-rf-images-is-really-not-that-hard-php-developers-wanted/msg296217/?topicseen#new
mahdollisesti kyntiin lhtiessn verotuksen ja kirjanpidon kannalta?
Jos siis oletetaan, ett tolta tulisi yksittisi myyntej ja maksualustana esim. paypal.
Pitp pyyt Leafilta pikkuruista 'Suomiosiota', ettei hmmennet noita ulkomaanelvi.
Hyv pointti, tnx Leaf
Tuo "linkki" kuulostaa enemmn kuin kiinnostavalta. Sit voisi jossain vaiheessa kyd lpi kotimaisella. Ohjelmointiapuja ei oikein tuohon ole, vaikka PHP:n kanssa paljonkin joskus vuosia sitten olen vkerrellyt erilaisia palvelin toteutuksia. Asiat tuppaa unohtumaan ja nyt aika menee tysin portfolion kasvattamisen ja kehittmisen kanssa. Mutta eiks toi softa niin toimi ett jokaisella kuvaajalla on oma palvelin kuville ja tlle softalle -> linkitys yhteiseen kuvahakuun.. joka on? Luulis ett tuon verokytnt on kaikkein helpoin, asiakas maksaa suoraan kuvaajalle ja siit kirjanpitoon..
Mutta toi toinen asia, onko sulle selv miksi tytit W-8ECI eik W-8BEN? Onko hajua mik on se ratkaiseva ero niden vlill..
Nyt tytyy tunnustaa, ett sumuisen kaalin sopukoista ei lydy vastausta... Itseni tuntien, oon varmaan kyllstyny aiheeseen ja arponut noiden kahden vlill. Melkeen kannattas vaikka tonne panna kysely, jos jollain olis kovalevy vhemmn sekasin: http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=18&sid=a7aad6f581359790d9c06de348c8c5c5
25
« on: February 05, 2013, 18:26 »
For me they are where they have always been.
|
Sponsors
Microstock Poll Results
Sponsors
|
Show Posts
