MicrostockGroup Sponsors


Author Topic: Using NASA resources - rejection problem  (Read 21260 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

« Reply #25 on: February 18, 2010, 08:06 »
0
Using free or purchased models with a simple sphere wrapped with a texture does not show a level of work high enough for iStock acceptance (thank goodness).  This is the kind of thing that is great for SS, but not for IS.

Had I received a 'not suitable as stock' rejection, your reply might make sense. As it is, it's merely a pointless insult that doesn't address my original question. Frankly, I'm offended by the rudeness of your response.
I wanted to know how to go about submitting images that contain NASA content. I didn't ask for a critique of my work, and if iStock rejected it for quality issues, then they should have stated the real reason for the rejection.

Quote from sjocke: If I were concerned about submitting to SS and an unasked for critique, your post would be very useful.  Thanks for the tips!

lol no problem, have to say though talk about giving it but cant take it!




« Reply #26 on: February 18, 2010, 10:17 »
0
lol no problem, have to say though talk about giving it but cant take it!

Yes, well, I did not bring my years old work up for discussion.  When I do, you shall be the first to know.


 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
5 Replies
4304 Views
Last post January 22, 2010, 10:12
by FD
33 Replies
13610 Views
Last post May 02, 2010, 16:45
by vlad_the_imp
7 Replies
3678 Views
Last post May 13, 2013, 02:20
by Poncke v2
8 Replies
7965 Views
Last post May 18, 2015, 17:44
by Mantis
7 Replies
2605 Views
Last post January 24, 2018, 15:57
by Brasilnut

Sponsors

Mega Bundle of 5,900+ Professional Lightroom Presets

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors