Many Dreamstime images there.
Did you already informed Dreamstime about it?

This seems to be a ploy of these sites.
I posted this in August. iS have apparently had my image removed (thanks), but all the Shutterstock-watermarked images are still there.
http://anglerz.com/sign-become-vip-member-with-the-art-cuisine.html
I'm not on SS, and have no idea if any SS members here contacted SS about it.

I'd agree that you rarely post, especially since you just created the account the same day as your post? 

Yes to all of you. Someone with these porn sites is just looking for "young girl" then linking to the thumbs to attract attention. Not right and also makes your daughter or family member look terrible if someone finds it on a porn site.

They leave the watermarks on but that doesn't make anyone feel better about being used!

Someone needs to see if they are also stealing bandwidth and just linking to the Dreamstime site for these.

I was researching a syndrome that affects mostly "Young Asian Boys" you don't want to see what came up most of the time. Talk about perverts.

I rarely post here on this site but this one got my attention! I contacted DT this morning and will let you gals/guys know what they say to me. Unacceptable to say the least!

i don't get the meaning of this site 

Wow, what a f... is that site? 

Good move, these places need to get notice that they can't steal or misuse watermarked images, and get away free.

I am also working with DT as well- filed complaint and my attorney is in touch with them.

This made me feel ill!
I have actually deactivated some images of my daughter with similar keywords: young girl, student, etc.
I don't want to risk some child porn site using her images to lure sicko's in.
What kind of a God * world?!
Sick 

I agree with a lot of sick people out there! For my models the key word 'Student' is vital - just need to track down these sick sites! Hope to hear from my attorney this week on what happen.

That's pretty disturbing. Using photos of children to an adult website. I wonder if the free images from Getty will encounter the same problem. Somebody creates an adult blog page in the hopes of getting ad revenue and uses our images. I would suggest contacting the FCC since all adult websites have to be regulated (all models have to be 18 years old/consent age) They might be able to help and shut it down since it crosses the line.

That's pretty disturbing. Using photos of children to an adult website. I wonder if the free images from Getty will encounter the same problem.

I'd hope surely if the embedded Getty images were used in that way that Getty would surely chase them up; if nothing else, because they're not being used editorially/not for profit. If Getty wouldn't chase them up for that sort of misuse, we may as well give up.

Might have meant FTC = Federal Trade Commission. http://business.ftc.gov/documents/bus28-advertising-and-marketing-internet-rules-road and that's only for the USA

Interpol for many other places. But here's a catch: There is no one set of laws that apply to the distribution, purchase, or possession of Internet pornography.

FCC is radio, TV, communications, but... The FCC does not regulate the Internet or Internet Service Providers.

What I'd say (as I'm NOT an attorney) is that this comes down to misuse of images and not pornography, because the site isn't selling these, but just improperly linking them from DT for promotions.

Sad situation and here we are again, making honest photos and someone finds a way to abuse that or misuse them. What next? Oh some DMCA and nothing happens, they go get someone else's photos of their kids and use those, until discovered.

We are unprotected and ignored as far as illegal or improper use of our photos and some prosecution to stop that from happening.