Author Topic: Maybe I have UFO on one of my photos! (Read 18393 times)

borg · « **Reply #50 on:** September 30, 2013, 13:42 »

Maybe it's UFO, but for sure is "poor lightning"...

Uncle Pete · « **Reply #51 on:** October 01, 2013, 12:54 »

None

Try National Enquirer or The Star. They have to get their cover shots of "Amazing real photo of a UFO" from someone. And not an agency to start with. There's not a big market and you might even be able to play up the "Exclusive" to some rag that wants to be the only one to have it.

Two quick points. UFOs are real. If it's flying and it's unidentified it's a UFO. The sample shot looks like the blurred back of a plane, nothing amazing. But it's a UFO.

The whole Alien Technology and visitors is a vivid imagination of what it might have been, too many 50s sci-fi movies, when (point two) 95% of all UFO sightings are explainable. Even J. Allen Hynek admits that. [Project Bluebook]

If you need to BELIEVE to accept UFOs as alien visitors, it's not science it's religion. If you will only accept solid repeatable evident, that has been verified, then it's science.

Quote from: borg on September 29, 2013, 10:56

I am exploring over Internet these days, which "ufology site" has credibility...
As I said before, there is a lot pics of ufos, many of them are far much worse than mine...

borg · « **Reply #52 on:** October 02, 2013, 06:39 »

Thank you for direct answer!

It seems that National Enquirer is not available for my area... I'm getting this message after click on their link.

borg · « **Reply #53 on:** October 08, 2013, 11:17 »

http://www.alamy.com/image-details-popup.asp?&n=NaN&imageid={561E6B2D-7AB7-4EB9-8F2B-368CE08F5767}

Ron · « **Reply #54 on:** October 08, 2013, 11:39 »

Why did you put it up on Alamy without any special pricing? I thought you were going to sell it off to a magazine for big bucks.

borg · « **Reply #55 on:** October 08, 2013, 13:05 »

Quote from: Ron on October 08, 2013, 11:39

Why did you put it up on Alamy without any special pricing? I thought you were going to sell it off to a magazine for big bucks.

I thought that on this way image can be published in multiple magazines...
Can I change it?

Also, no answer from any magazine so far...

JPSDK · « **Reply #56 on:** October 08, 2013, 14:22 »

It cant. Or not likely, as it is now, the picture could be anything.

The picture is nothing without the story.

You should much rather have published the picture in the local newspaper, with the dramatic story of how you captured it.

borg · « **Reply #57 on:** October 08, 2013, 14:56 »

There was no anything dramatic... I was on the beach and I have camera that day with me... That is all!

Image will wait on Alamy so that is all about it..

P.S.

Or find me a good buyer and I'll give you 25%-33% of earning...

borg · « **Reply #58 on:** October 15, 2013, 16:01 »

What!? No comments any more! You can see the image on Alamy now...

Please see link above...

bunhill · « **Reply #59 on:** October 15, 2013, 17:31 »

Quote from: borg on October 15, 2013, 16:01

What!? No comments any more! You can see the image on Alamy now...
Please see link above...

Your camera sensor badly needs cleaning.

JPSDK · « **Reply #60 on:** October 15, 2013, 21:02 »

The problem here is that you got all excited because you thought you had photographed a ufo in the form of an alien spaceship.
You present the picture to us, in super small size, so we have no chance to see what it is or analyze it.

So what do you expect?

Should we all cheer you for having photographed a ufo?
For having a picture of a ufo? ( that can be done better in photoshop).
Should we comment on the way you handle the whole matter?

as I said, 95% of the ufos people think they photograph are insects.
Im not sure about yours, I cannot analyze it properly, without seeing the full image and knowing exif.
And you dont provide those data, so what can we do?

So it will remain an UAD (Unidentified Artefact in a Digital file).
And they are many and not very interesting.

Give me access to the full size, untouched file, and I shall analyze it for you. And yes, I have done that before with peoples "Ufo" pictures.

borg · « **Reply #61 on:** October 16, 2013, 02:56 »

Ok. Fair enough!
How can I send to you that image in full resolution and which format!?

Also if there is a chance that could be UFO, I am giving 33% of earnings who find adequate publisher which is willing to publish that photo...

mtkang · « **Reply #62 on:** October 16, 2013, 10:46 »

why not just contact all the news and magazines? alamy or other agency will need to look for buyer or i don't know a buyer who is interested of ufo will look for stock agency.

JPSDK · « **Reply #63 on:** October 16, 2013, 13:12 »

Argumentation can be provided, why it is not an alien spaceship.
But it would take long and be boring.

It starts with the definition of life, and so far, Hollywood and the media, have no understanding, but just picture life as a carbon based symetrical form that operates in the atom x 6,2 x 10 x 23 space, just like we do.

That is so narrow minded. Alian life might be based on extracting energy from sulfor, magnetism, electricity or pressure differences.

Life might be assymetric, based on plasma streams or gravity fields.

Such life would not appear in spaceships we could recognize. Also, they would not be interested in visiting places where space energy was close to zero.

Such life would just crawl through us or, dependant on size, just crawl through our planet.
That would not be nice, so its good that they dont bother to come here.

stocker2011 · « **Reply #64 on:** October 16, 2013, 13:32 »

Agreed, my current opinion is that if an alien life form were to visit earth it would almost certainly be invisible to our eyes and would be a probe that may just hover around our atmosphere collecting data to bring back to a higher intelligence to examine, because if they were technologically advanced enough to get here from another part of the universe (or dimension?) then we would almost certainly not be the first life form they have encountered.

Sorry to go off-topic

BImages · « **Reply #65 on:** October 16, 2013, 13:44 »

It's an insect flying...

bunhill · « **Reply #66 on:** October 16, 2013, 14:01 »

Quote from: Buzbuzzer on October 16, 2013, 13:44

It's an insect flying...

yep. Very close to the camera - much much closer to us than the bird and hence out of focus.

luissantos84 · « **Reply #67 on:** October 16, 2013, 14:08 »

Quote from: bhr on October 16, 2013, 14:01

Quote from: Buzbuzzer on October 16, 2013, 13:44
It's an insect flying...

yep. Very close to the camera - much much closer to us than the bird and hence out of focus.

or very far

bunhill · « **Reply #68 on:** October 16, 2013, 14:13 »

Quote from: luissantos84 on October 16, 2013, 14:08

Quote from: bhr on October 16, 2013, 14:01
Quote from: Buzbuzzer on October 16, 2013, 13:44
It's an insect flying...

yep. Very close to the camera - much much closer to us than the bird and hence out of focus.

or very far

If you focus on a bird at that distance I should have thought that everything to infinity would be in focus. Only foreground stuff would be out of focus.

luissantos84 · « **Reply #69 on:** October 16, 2013, 14:45 »

Quote from: bhr on October 16, 2013, 14:13

Quote from: luissantos84 on October 16, 2013, 14:08
Quote from: bhr on October 16, 2013, 14:01
Quote from: Buzbuzzer on October 16, 2013, 13:44
It's an insect flying...

yep. Very close to the camera - much much closer to us than the bird and hence out of focus.

or very far

If you focus on a bird at that distance I should have thought that everything to infinity would be in focus. Only foreground stuff would be out of focus.

or it is an UFO

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Maybe I have UFO on one of my photos! (Read 18393 times)

borg

Uncle Pete

borg

borg

Ron

borg

JPSDK

borg

borg

bunhill

JPSDK

borg

mtkang

JPSDK

stocker2011

BImages

bunhill

luissantos84

bunhill

luissantos84

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors