I just had a quick visit with the site and did three searches: happy family, tropical beach and businesswoman office

What a train wreck!

Keyword relevance is the default search result order and for tropical beach, the first 10 results didn't even include a beach (or any type of water). The happy family search produced dogs and a carriage (and a woman with a dog). The first two images for businesswoman office were of security check at the airport.

I can't imagine how a buyer could ever find anything with this search

Then there are the licenses - it appears only Editorial or Extended, but the prices are the same for both, 29 euros for the full size file: editorial example, extended example. And if you look at the editorial example, that's a posed image with women who look like models - how is that editorial in any way - other than the photographer forgot to get a release?

And a "personal print license" for 399 euros for this? And no definition of what this costly license is that I can find?

I cannot see anything to recommend this site - either to contributors or to buyers.

And you can buy the logo: http://www.foximages.eu/photo/18737/photo-details.html

LOL!

Featured photo titled "girl riding horse" is a girl sitting on a bench. Something lost in the translation. The fox logo is not a tourist attraction on black. Next they will offer 70% for all artists and it's still not going to get anybody to join the fox farce site.

But it does help with the survey question. Would you sell for 70% of a dollar download? It depends on where and what site, not just percentage.

I boycott anything that glamourises foxes, for they are nasty creatures that like to prey on smaller, weaker but far more beautiful and useful creatures than themselves.

well you can keep eating your caged chicken eggs all you like, but I prefer my hens to enjoy freeranging.