Author Topic: Anyone using GH4 for stock (Read 1778 times)

Desiren · « **on:** July 22, 2014, 00:32 »

Hey Everyone, I'm Nick, I've been shooting Stock for quite some time now and uploading and downloading from different sites, anyone using Gh4 to shoot stock? cranes or any cool toys? What do you find sells best?

08stock08 · « **Reply #1 on:** July 22, 2014, 07:31 »

If you mean GH4 to Lumix GH4, it is nice camera with right controls. I have not used it but going by its specs and few pix at flickr. I can see it is stock ready camera.

Epsilonth · « **Reply #2 on:** July 22, 2014, 10:58 »

Tried it at a store. It's even snappier than my X-T1. Donno about the quality though.. but any modern camera will mostly do fine at low iso.

etudiante_rapide · « **Reply #3 on:** July 22, 2014, 13:50 »

it's not the camera and expensive equipment, it's the photographer.
as Ansel Adams, certainly not a stock photographers, said in his seminars all the time during his time on this earth, there are no good or bad photographs, just good or bad photographers.

i still see Matthew Brady and other younger peers of Brady who used fully manual view camera (no digital, not even auto flash in those days), and even Speed Grafiks users, and today students with K1000 pentaxes
that produce amazing photographs. atst, i see a lot of expensive cameras and big bazookas costing more than your car, that produce some of the scariest baddest (as in bad photographers)... how many? many !!!

the best equipment for you is the one you master. it can even be a PNS. just don't tell the reviewers you used that. empty the EXIFs and when asked, say, "oh, only the most expensive and the latest gadget for me, nothing else !"

elvinstar · « **Reply #4 on:** July 22, 2014, 14:23 »

Quote from: etudiante_rapide on July 22, 2014, 13:50

it's not the camera and expensive equipment, it's the photographer.
as Ansel Adams, certainly not a stock photographers, said in his seminars all the time during his time on this earth, there are no good or bad photographs, just good or bad photographers.

i still see Matthew Brady and other younger peers of Brady who used fully manual view camera (no digital, not even auto flash in those days), and even Speed Grafiks users, and today students with K1000 pentaxes
that produce amazing photographs. atst, i see a lot of expensive cameras and big bazookas costing more than your car, that produce some of the scariest baddest (as in bad photographers)... how many? many !!!

the best equipment for you is the one you master. it can even be a PNS. just don't tell the reviewers you used that. empty the EXIFs and when asked, say, "oh, only the most expensive and the latest gadget for me, nothing else !"

I don't believe that the OP was asking how saleable his photos would be, but rather would photos from the GH4 pass technical inspection.

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Anyone using GH4 for stock (Read 1778 times)

Desiren

08stock08

Epsilonth

etudiante_rapide

elvinstar

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors