of course,I said tomato because writing �tomato� or �Roma� or �Italian style�makes no difference to me.

this is all fine as long as everything is represented in a generic way,if instead someone want to represent a real event or real news in Rome that actually happened,the matter is different,this cannot be done.

if instead I want to create a Roman Forum with 2 Arches of Tito,it's simply a dystopian,fictional Rome,so I label the content as AI,and in fact I also declare that the persons and properties are fictitious,and I definitely add the word �Rome� in the description and keywords,because the content always represents Rome,even if it's a fictitious Rome.

there is a difference between a real person,or a real artist and the name of a city or a country.

I don't create city AI content simply because I think AI is better suited to other types of content,but doing so is not a violation of any rule.

yes,I too have noticed content that I think is AI and that actually are not labeled as AI,this is definitely something to avoid,and this is our responsibility first of all and then also Adobe's responsibility of course.

I am more than certain that anyone who demonstrates repeat behavior in this sense will be permanently blocked by Adobe.

while if it happens once,due to distraction it can happen,it is blocked temporarily.

Given the amount of content added weekly,it's easy for something to slip through a first check,but I'm more than certain that Adobe performs more checks periodically than just the first review.

then once the file is downloaded everything is in the hands of the customer.

if I go in a gun shop and buy a gun and then go down to the street and start shooting people,no one will ever blame the gun shop for that!

Anyone can get a driver's license,but if someone enjoys spending the day trying to run over as many pedestrians as possible,what should we do?Take away everyone's license?

I have to index the content correctly then if someone uses AI content irresponsibly it is certainly not my fault because I wrote �Roma�.

Quote from: Injustice for all on January 15, 2025, 14:55

of course,I said tomato because writing �tomato� or �Roma� or �Italian style�makes no difference to me.

I have to index the content correctly then if someone uses AI content irresponsibly it is certainly not my fault because I wrote �Roma�.

I say Sydney and you bring up some obscure similar name that could cause a problem in two languages, when translated. Nice try. Can you do that for Chicago, Cleveland, Columbus, San Francisco, and 98% of the other city names, mountain names, people and fake AI images, that shouldn't use real names or real name places in their keywords and identification? Probably not.

I don't care if you make AI or not, that's your choice. I choose not to, and maybe if you did photos, you wouldn't shoot what I enjoy and upload. All OK with me.

I'm looking for a little integrity in what people upload, especially when it's a false representation, of a real place. Or a picture of someone, that's not that person. You can't make a fake AI sports car and say it's a picture of a Ferrari, and shouldn't because... It's Not What you claim it is. That's dishonest, just as labeling a Roma tomato as a watermelon, when it's not.

Yeah, it would be terrible if people got confused between a Roma and the city Roma and couldn't tell the difference in under 5 seconds. Yet you defend outright fraud in labeling a fake AI image as a real place?   

I understand your concerns, and I partially share them,but i also know it's gone.

we now live in a dystopian world,because the innate need in human beings for something different,new,unreal world.

just look at tv shows,movies,among the most succesful there are several dystopian ones,which I also really appreciate.

AI text to image or video,are the perfect example of the need for something different,new,unreal.

I understand that you don't care in the slightest whether someone uses AI or not,you simply chose not to use them,and continue to do what you like best and do best,and in my opinion this is very nice of you because you value freedom.

but at the same time you try to cling to reality,real cities,real names,it is wrong for you to use the name of a real city and should not be used in the description or keywords.

I,however,think that there is a fundamental difference between using the name of a real person or the name of a city,location,country.

I use the keywords that are allowed,label the content as AI and simply do my job.

I don't defend fraud in labeling a fake image as real,in fact I label all my AI content as AI,but I still have to use the word "Rome" if I create a fictional Rome,how else should I define it?just city? 

I am simply aware that I now live in a dystopian world,and I try to adapt to survival in this world,if I create a fake Roma,I have to put the word Roma,otherwise my content won't be found,and this doesn't change the fact that other dystopian Romes are found,so what changes?

I understand your concerns and partly share,but I don't think that all this can be stopped,the human need to distort reality,which in this historical moment is very strong.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html



Your Generative AI content prompts, titles or keywords:

    May not contain names of artists, real known people, fictional characters, or reference to creative works that are still in copyright. Please see HERE for additional information.

    May not contain names of people.

    May not imply the content is a depiction of an actual newsworthy event.

    May not contain names of government agencies.

    May not contain references to third party intellectual property.

If a contributor violates this policy, we will review and take appropriate action, which may include removing the content or terminating the contributor's account.

2. Label content as Generative AI prior to submission.

    Click the "Created using generative AI tools" [1] checkbox in the Adobe Stock contributor portal before submitting content created with generative AI software.
    Click the "People and Property are fictional" box [2] if your image or video features a fake person or fake property.

Here is the HERE:  https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/updated-artist-name-guidelines.html

    May not include or reference fictional characters

    Creative work names such as a movie, franchise, comic, art, design, or architecture

    May not include or reference other creative work, such as �...in the style of...�, �...inspired by...�, �...influenced by...�, �...in the tradition of...�, or �....drawing on...�


Not just me, it's in the Adobe Guidelines.

If someone wants to upload a fake cityscape, they could use, fictional Metropolitan Italian city , or fictional Australian port city with a harbor.  Buyers can find things, without using a proper name of a real place, for a fake and inaccurate image.

Yes, well done Adobe!!!  keep it going 
Sure that AI sheeps are alrerady crying 

Next step:
- One section with real photography of real world, taken by photographers, excluding any AI images.
- Another section with AI generation engine directly used by customers, prompting themself what they want, maybe wih voice recognition (100% royalties for Adobe).

GOOD EXCITING NEWS!!!

Well Done Adobe.