Author Topic: FT counter attacks IS (Read 11801 times)

Ron · « **Reply #25 on:** April 09, 2014, 14:41 »

For different reasons as you are implying.

mlwinphoto · « **Reply #26 on:** April 09, 2014, 14:56 »

Quote from: tickstock on April 09, 2014, 14:29

Quote from: Ron on April 09, 2014, 14:28
Quote from: tickstock on April 09, 2014, 14:25
Exactly, downloads at Shutterstock have been increasing while downloads at higher priced sites have been decreasing. No wonder all of these companies are introducing very cheap, unlimited, streaming, embed, or monthly subs plans.
You are doing extremely well as Getty IS exclusive, so why are you moaning in this thread about subs at FT?
I think I would be doing a lot better if people weren't supporting these low priced subs giveaways.

You're supporting iStock, iStock has subs. Right? I don't know if you have any images in their subs programs and I don't really care but by being an iStock contributor you are also supporting their policies...by the simple fact of being a part of the company.

tickstock · « **Reply #27 on:** April 09, 2014, 15:00 »

mlwinphoto · « **Reply #28 on:** April 09, 2014, 15:32 »

Quote from: tickstock on April 09, 2014, 15:00

Quote from: mlwinphoto on April 09, 2014, 14:56
Quote from: tickstock on April 09, 2014, 14:29
Quote from: Ron on April 09, 2014, 14:28
Quote from: tickstock on April 09, 2014, 14:25
Exactly, downloads at Shutterstock have been increasing while downloads at higher priced sites have been decreasing. No wonder all of these companies are introducing very cheap, unlimited, streaming, embed, or monthly subs plans.
You are doing extremely well as Getty IS exclusive, so why are you moaning in this thread about subs at FT?

I think I would be doing a lot better if people weren't supporting these low priced subs giveaways.

You're supporting iStock, iStock has subs. Right? I don't know if you have any images in their subs programs and I don't really care but by being an iStock contributor you are also supporting their policies...by the simple fact of being a part of the company.
I won't be supporting them going forward if I can make that work.

You can make it work.....best of luck to you.

luissantos84 · « **Reply #29 on:** April 09, 2014, 16:32 »

Quote from: Ron on April 09, 2014, 14:27

Quote from: gbalex on April 09, 2014, 14:06
"FT counter attacks IS"

Yes we all know that IS is ultimately responsible for the sub war.

Shutterstock is the leader in subscription royalty-free imagery

Luis is merely pointing out that soon after IS introduces subs, FT makes subs more prominent on their website. This thread is not about who started Subs first, nor about Shutterstock. This thread is about IS and FT and recent changes. Not about something started in 2004. Get over it.

YEP, thank god someone understands it

heywoody · « **Reply #30 on:** April 09, 2014, 16:38 »

subs shmubs - returns from credit sales on IS these days are not that far from sub royalties anyway

tickstock · « **Reply #31 on:** April 09, 2014, 16:51 »

luissantos84 · « **Reply #32 on:** April 09, 2014, 16:56 »

have you seen the 2nd screenshot?

I guess you are just trying to irritate me, anyway I have a hot girlfriend waiting, you enjoy the forum dude

tickstock · « **Reply #33 on:** April 09, 2014, 17:02 »

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: FT counter attacks IS (Read 11801 times)

Ron

mlwinphoto

tickstock

mlwinphoto

luissantos84

heywoody

tickstock

luissantos84

tickstock

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors