Author Topic: Image types and categories MISSING from the marketplace and requests from buyers (Read 7796 times)

johngriffin · « **Reply #1 on:** February 25, 2009, 18:53 »

I forgot to mention, but I would love it if you uploaded images to the site that you felt were a good fit for any of these categories and types above. They don't have to be exclusive but you can make them if you want. John

m@m · « **Reply #2 on:** February 25, 2009, 23:19 »

Are this pictures going to take as long to get review as the other ones already uploaded on the site that are still pending?

UncleGene · « **Reply #3 on:** February 26, 2009, 00:16 »

[deleted by author]

gostwyck · « **Reply #4 on:** February 26, 2009, 04:42 »

Interesting & useful stuff there John. Thanks for the info.

MikLav · « **Reply #5 on:** February 26, 2009, 04:52 »

Quote from: gostwyck on February 26, 2009, 04:42

Interesting & useful stuff there John. Thanks for the info.

Yep, useful hints

Thank you John!

m@m · « **Reply #6 on:** February 26, 2009, 12:14 »

BTW UncleGene...If ever there is a moment that I would need someones opinion of my work, except coming from a buyer, I will ask for it.

John, sorry for the earlier sarcasm, it is a very useful information, Thank you.

johngriffin · « **Reply #7 on:** February 26, 2009, 13:03 »

hahaha i got the sarcasm and hope you notice that reviews are going faster now ;-)

UncleGene I am sorry to hear that experience and I want to make sure it is working for you now. You are always more than welcome to email me if you do encounter issues.

melastmohican · « **Reply #8 on:** February 26, 2009, 15:00 »

I am not getting one thing from the article. These concepts/images were already used by somebody so why bother creating/uploading similars?

Ssuper · « **Reply #9 on:** February 26, 2009, 16:37 »

ahaha John " a large and very informed buyer ". How large was he ?

johngriffin · « **Reply #10 on:** February 26, 2009, 18:34 »

ssuper hahaha large and in charge

@melastmohican These ideas are ones that this large buyer said were under-represented and were areas that photographers could shoot and were needed. Once I heard these topics I started to ask other buyers and they completely agreed. I am sure people have tried to shoot them but this was highlighted as a glaring hole in the marketplace. I wasn't trying to say they were used already or already shot but only meant that they were highlighted as missing from the marketplace and could be shot. Just some ideas to throw out there.

UncleGene · « **Reply #11 on:** February 27, 2009, 00:13 »

Quote from: m@m on February 26, 2009, 12:14

BTW UncleGene...If ever there is a moment that I would need someones opinion of my work, except coming from a buyer, I will ask for it.

I've spent several minutes trying to understand what could cause such reaction.
Still not sure, may be you thought that by "first couple examples" I meant your work? If yes, than you are wrong, sorry for not being clear.
First couple examples are from the article. Or they are yours?

If you check my past posts, I never ever judge others art work.
The only thing that pisses me off, and my sarcasm in this post was about it, is incompetence in support (customer, technical, reviews, etc.)

snaprender · « **Reply #12 on:** February 27, 2009, 01:46 »

Quote from: UncleGene on February 27, 2009, 00:13

Quote from: m@m on February 26, 2009, 12:14
BTW UncleGene...If ever there is a moment that I would need someones opinion of my work, except coming from a buyer, I will ask for it.
I've spent several minutes trying to understand what could cause such reaction.
Still not sure, may be you thought that by "first couple examples" I meant your work? If yes, than you are wrong, sorry for not being clear.
First couple examples are from the article. Or they are yours?

If you check my past posts, I never ever judge others art work.
The only thing that pisses me off, and my sarcasm in this post was about it, is incompetence in support (customer, technical, reviews, etc.)

The few times I have had to email Cutcaster for support or whatever, I have always got a very expedient response...even on a weekend before. Maybe you can post or give a link to the photo's that got rejected for composition?

m@m · « **Reply #13 on:** February 27, 2009, 08:57 »

UncleGene I must have missunderstud the (first few example) part of your post and thought that it was in reference to my photos and not to the article, for that I must apologise, I must have had a senior moment I guess. Best regards.

snaprender, It was all a missunderstanding on my reading, they where no rejected photos, so there is nothing to see.

UncleGene · « **Reply #14 on:** February 28, 2009, 12:53 »

Quote from: snaprender on February 27, 2009, 01:46

The few times I have had to email Cutcaster for support or whatever, I have always got a very expedient response...even on a weekend before. Maybe you can post or give a link to the photo's that got rejected for composition?

My apologies to everybody, and at the first place - to John. Will delete my original message. My complaints have absolutely no relation to Cutcaster, the only problem I have with it that my photos do not sell

All my rants were about different site, that just happen to start with the same letter (CS), and I am either getting blind or crazy, as Cutcaster name was all over the thread

tan510jomast · « **Reply #15 on:** February 28, 2009, 17:30 »

Quote from: UncleGene on February 27, 2009, 00:13

Quote from: m@m on February 26, 2009, 12:14
BTW UncleGene...If ever there is a moment that I would need someones opinion of my work, except coming from a buyer, I will ask for it.
I've spent several minutes trying to understand what could cause such reaction.
Still not sure, may be you thought that by "first couple examples" I meant your work? If yes, than you are wrong, sorry for not being clear.
First couple examples are from the article. Or they are yours?

If you check my past posts, I never ever judge others art work.
The only thing that pisses me off, and my sarcasm in this post was about it, is incompetence in support (customer, technical, reviews, etc.)

perharps neither of you ppl were intentionally being sarcastic. and it's not difficult to be misunderstood. but it's good that both of you cleared it up so quickly.
yet, another good reason to be careful with sarcasm in this forum , as we are global and each culture has a different outlook in how they view skepticism and sarcasm.
cheers !

MicrostockGroup Sponsors

Author Topic: Image types and categories MISSING from the marketplace and requests from buyers (Read 7796 times)

johngriffin

johngriffin

m@m

UncleGene

gostwyck

MikLav

m@m

johngriffin

melastmohican

Ssuper

johngriffin

UncleGene

snaprender

m@m

UncleGene

tan510jomast

Related Topics

Sponsors

Microstock Poll Results

Sponsors